David will be in good company as there are a number of GMs who have PhDs including the recently retired (from economics) GM Ken Rogoff with a PhD in Economics and now at Harvard (see here for chess games). Surprise surprise; perhaps David can get a few games going with Ken, eh?.
Another tip for David: Harvard is in Boston in Massachusetts. The New England Nor'easters, new expansion team, has just won the 2010 US Chess League Championship. See here. New England Nor'easters included IM Sam Shankland on first board, he of the "I'll quit chess!!!" 'cos he could not achieve the GM title fame. But to be fair, Sam is actually playing at GM strength. (see my earlier blogs here and here.) Sam is attending nearby (to Harvard) Brandeis University.
I think David will also benefit associating with IM David Vigorito who leads The New England Nor'easters. IM Vigorito is a renowned US chess theoretician who has written several well-received chess books on opening theory including Attacking Chess: The King's Indian, Volume 1, UNDERSTANDING THE MARSHALL ATTACK, CHESS EXPLAINED: THE MAIN-LINE SLAV, Play the Semi-Slav, Challenging the Nimzo-Indian as well as being a regular author/contributor to the premier chess opening website (subscription-based), ChessPublishing, and forum (free). Hmmm ...... I think even David Smerdon has visted the ChessPub forum.
Sam Shankland blogged on how David Vigorito prepared the team to tie the match against their cross-city rivals, the he Boston Blitz!
I would like to go back to week 8 for a moment.
At the time, we decided, as a team, not to reveal what happened so that our formula for success would not be known. Now that the season is over, I think it’s a good time to do a proper report on the beginning phase of the match. The boards in question were boards 1 and 3, where FM Braden Bournival and myself had black against IM Irina Krush and GM Giorgi Kacheishvili, respectively. Kachi is a great player, and he has had very good results in the league. With him having the white pieces against some random dude, he must have been expected to win. Likewise, IM Krush is quite reasonable on the third board, and Bournival is a little bit out of practice. These were the two boards where we seemed to be most vulnerable.
Enter IM Dave Vigorito, our manager, a renowned opening theoretician and author, the USCLs 2010 father of the year, and the brains behind the whole operation. His keen eye noted a key game from the last round of the 2010 World Open- the game Kacheishvili – Vallejo Pons. This game featured the piece sacrifice line of the mainline Slav, and Kachi played an interesting idea with 9. … Nxf7!?. Vallejo, however, was up to the task and managed to force an equal endgame. This had not gone unnoticed by yours truly, but Dave took it one step further. He realized that Krush is Kachi’s student, and he likely had shown her this line. As a result, he recommended that Braden play the piece sacrifice line, in hopes of surprising Krush’s intended “surprise” move by following Vallejo’s plan. She never could have suspected that he would know exactly what to do, and Braden held a draw without any difficulties on the board where our opponents were the most favored. Kachi naturally assumed that when I played the piece sac line I had prepared for Nxf7 (which I had), but I spent much more of my time preparing for the mainline, 9. fxe4. I found some interesting ideas, and Kachi erred at some point, leaving me with a slightly better endgame that I ground into a win. However, the most genius part of this operation was Dave’s recommendation for me to stall a little so that the Krush-Bournival game reached the position after 8. … Bxe4 first. While Kachi would know that I had prepared this line, there would be no way for Krush to know that we had heavily prepared Nxf7- she has never played it before, so why would Brad even look at such a move? As a result, we got exactly what we wanted from the opening in these games, and we scored 1.5/2 where we seemed to be underdogs on paper.
For The Australian story on David see here.
PS. I too have dabbled in behavioural economics. Really fascinating and a change from the neo-classical selfish profit maximiser. Check out David Smerdon's blog for his take on behavioural economics. If you are intrigued, check these out: Herbert Simon one of the so-called father of behavioural economics, Nobel laureate and his Nobel lecture; Daniel Kahneman, nobel laureate, famous for his collaboration with Amos Tversky (both Kahneman and Tversky are truly the "fathers" of behavioural economics) and his Nobel lecture; Richard Thaler (and here)and here for academic papers and this one.
PPS In case you are wondering why Amos Tversky did not receive the Nobel prize, it is because he died before it was awarded in 2002 and the rules of the Nobel prixe is that it can only be awarded to living persons.



